Compare · General B2B · Dun & Bradstreet
ParseData vs Dun & Bradstreet
Dun & Bradstreet and ParseData both sell lead data, but they are built on different foundations. Here is an honest read on where each fits — including where Dun & Bradstreet is genuinely stronger.
At a glance
Side by side
| Dun & Bradstreet | ParseData | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Business firmographic & credit data | Cross-industry buying-signal lead data |
| Pricing | Est. ~$5.4k/yr Essentials, $25k+/yr enterprise, quote | $99–$599/mo, self-serve, transparent |
| Data spine | Proprietary D&B Data Cloud (DUNS) + licensed Bombora | Official records as dated, first-class Parse events |
| Model | Sales-led / quote-gated | Parse-first, self-serve |
What they do
Dun & Bradstreet
330M+ companies with DUNS linkage, spend capacity, Bombora intent and news Parses — official records are buried in the credit file, not surfaced as events.
Source: www.dnb.com. Pricing per the competitive-landscape research (public pages + third-party estimates).
Where ParseData differs
ParseData's edge
- Regulatory events as dated Parses rather than static firmographics + commercial intent.
- Self-serve and transparent, no quote gate.
Where they're stronger
Dun & Bradstreet's edge
- DUNS linkage, corporate family trees and credit/spend-capacity data are a deep proprietary asset.
The honest read
D&B is the firmographic/credit standard. ParseData adds the regulatory-event Parse layer it lacks, self-serve.
Comparison is observational and based on public information as cited; vendor names and trademarks belong to their owners. ParseData serves sanitized public US federal records — not a consumer report, no FCRA use.